Philosophical Observations

  • I touched on this briefly last week but I really think it’s a separate discussion that needs to look deeper into the misunderstanding – from both sides, as we parent and grandparent our children together.

    Now tell me this, not have you ever, but how many times this week have you felt judged by your own parents for the way you are raising your children? Not always out loud – but in the looks, the comments, the ‘we never did it like that’ remarks?

    And grandparents – do you remember your parents making you feel the same way?

    Seems a bit like a cycle to me?

    Regardless, suddenly were not just parenting our children, we are managing a whole other layer of emotion.

    Now, as a disabled mum, I have very specific and intentional ways in which I parent my children, there is no book on how to raise both a disabled child and a typical child at the same time. What works for one does not work for the other and one child, the typically developed child, is often sidelined. Not on purpose, but out of necessity.  My mother was a single parent who raised three polarised girls, each of us is a complete opposite of the other. We were raised in the late 80’s, through the nineties and the youngest into the 2000’s, three diffident decades of childcare, and back then, whilst the differences are not so extremer as they are now, there were adaptions in parenting that needed to be made. Us ‘eldest children’ were able to see perfectly well on our own how the youngest sibling was raised and how it was different to us. We believe that its because our parents learned through raising us how to eventually raise the last one, but was it maybe a bit of ‘changing parent times’ too? Maybe a question to raise with our parents.

    My mother and I have healthy debates on childcare, unfortunately for my mother, I do say this with a heartfelt meaning, she usually loses. Why – she wasn’t given an option to win. Not necessarily because I’m stubborn (although I am) but because we are taking about MY children and in the instance, my word goes. Not because I know better, most of the time I’m just making things up as I go along, but because I know different.

    Our parents were taught to focus on behaviour, we are being taught to focus on emotions. They were told consistency and discipline mattered most… we are told connection and regulation come first. Its not just a different method, it’s a completely different language.

    How often have you looked back at your childhood and thought to yourself, I wish my child was that obedient, or I wish my child was that independent – for me it’s been often, that tells me that our parents did not get it wrong – it was just a simpler time when children were children and not ‘future leaders’ or ‘aspiring entrepreneurs’. There was absolutely no way that I was viewed as a protentional trailblazer as a child, but now, with our children, and this ‘you can be whatever you want to be’ mindset – there is a recognition that our children can potentially be quote/unquote ‘someone’ in the world. That stops our children from just being children and it turns them into ‘someone’.

    This means that its not just different parenting styles we are talking about, its two completely different generations trying to understand each other. Our parents raised us with what they had – the knowledge, the tools, the norms of that time. So when we do things differently now, it can feel personal to them…. Even though we don’t mean it that way. Because what they often hear isn’t, this works better for my child, but, what you did wasn’t good enough.

    This is where the tension comes, from somewhere in the middle of it all, there is us… trying to respect where we came from – while also being intentional about where we are going. Were setting boundaries that feel normal to us, but can feel like rejection to them, were trying to break cycles, while they are trying to feel like they didn’t get it wrong. No one talks about how heavy that is – being the one who holds both sides, the child of your parents and the parent of your child.

    But, I think its really important to pause here for a moment, because there is another side to this, and a side that always almost gets missed.  For our parents, now grandparents, this can be really hard too, because they are not just watching us parent differently, they are watching the way they raised us be quietly rewritten….

    And if you are listening as a grandparent – this part really matters….

    This isn’t your child rejecting you, this is your child trying to be intentional. The way we parent now isn’t a criticism of how you did it, it’s a reflection of what we have learned since. And the truth is…. Everything that we are building now is built on the foundation that you gave us.

    We don’t need you to agree with every decision, but we do need you to trust that we are trying, and more than anything, we still need you, just in a slight different way.

    Because this isn’t about one generation being right and one being wrong, its about understanding that we are all trying to do the same thing, just from different starting points.

    And maybe, if we can meet each other there, not in agreement, but in understanding, this doesn’t have to feel like conflict, it can feel like growth, and maybe…. One day….. our children will do the same to us.

  • I think I’ve accidentally stumbled into writing a memoir with my dad.

    Now, when I say memoir, I need everyone to understand that this was not the plan. I am not sat in a countryside cottage wearing linen trousers and smoking a pipe while I reconnect with my ancestry. I’m usually recording these podcasts while somebody is shouting for snacks, the dog is emotionally buffering in the corner, and there’s washing in the machine that’s been washed three times because I forgot to hang it up.

    But recently I started talking to my dad about his life growing up in Northern Rhodesia and Southern Rhodesia, now Zambia and Zimbabwe, and I have realised something that has honestly unsettled me a little bit.

    Those stories are disappearing.

    Like… actively disappearing.

    And I don’t mean disappearing in some dramatic “the library is burning down” kind of way. I mean disappearing in the very ordinary way that stories disappear when people get older and nobody asks the questions anymore.

    My dad started telling me about moving house on a train. A TRAIN. Imagine explaining that to a modern child. Not “we hired movers.” Not “we got a van.” They literally loaded their lives into train carts and travelled north through Africa.

    And suddenly I had this really emotional moment where I realised my children will never naturally encounter these worlds unless somebody deliberately preserves them.

    And I don’t mean preserves them politically. That’s not what this is. I mean preserves them humanly.

    The texture of life.

    The dust.

    The heat.

    The baboons in the maize fields.

    The black mamba whose head disappeared into soft mud because the rain had loosened the earth.

    Those details matter.

    Because that’s the difference between history and lived experience.

    History says, “There was political unrest.”

    A story says, “The adults started speaking quietly at night and people stopped travelling after dark.”

    That’s what I care about.

    And honestly, I think that’s why I’ve become so obsessed with objects and atmosphere and all these weird symbolic things in my apartment. Because modern life can feel so emotionally sterile sometimes. Everything is beige and temporary and replaceable. Nobody wants to inherit grandma’s cabinet anymore. Everybody just wants clean lines and LED lighting.

    And I sit there looking at a hundred-year-old object thinking… yes, but somebody touched this. Somebody cried near this. Somebody moved this across continents. Somebody loved this enough to keep it alive long enough for it to end up in my home.

    That matters to me deeply.

    I think we underestimate how psychologically important continuity is for human beings.

    And I know this sounds dramatic, but I genuinely think part of the reason people feel emotionally untethered now is because we are losing our relationship to inherited stories. Everything is becoming so fast that nothing has time to emotionally settle anymore.

    My daughter is 11 and she’s currently devouring mythology books. Percy Jackson, all of it. And I realised recently that what I actually want more than anything is to raise children who can see deeper into the human experience.

    Not children who simply consume content.

    Children who feel life.

    Who understand that behind every old photograph, every strange object, every family story, there was once a real person sitting in sunlight somewhere having an ordinary Tuesday.

    And maybe that’s why this memoir project suddenly feels so important to me.

    Because my dad carries these worlds inside him so casually. He’ll start telling me about one thing and suddenly two hours later we’re discussing prison riots near the Congo border, guerrilla warfare, moving cattle, giant snakes, and stories about his brothers that sound like something out of Wilbur Smith.

    And the whole time he’s speaking, I’m thinking:

    “How are these stories not written down already?”

    And maybe they were never written down because the people who lived them were too busy surviving them.

    That happens a lot throughout history actually. The people most capable of writing beautiful memoirs are often the people who finally have enough stillness to reflect. Previous generations didn’t always have that luxury.

    So maybe my role is not necessarily to be the person who lived the extraordinary story. Maybe my role is to preserve it properly.

    To take oral history and carry it carefully into permanence.

    And honestly, I think that’s become my purpose a little bit lately.

    Not fame.

    Not becoming some celebrity author.

    Not proving I’m intelligent.

    I just don’t want these worlds to vanish.

    Because one day my dad won’t be here anymore. And all those stories — the train carts, the baboons, the dust storms, the black mamba, the farm, the laughter, the grief — they could disappear in one generation if nobody stops long enough to listen.

    And I think listening may actually be one of the deepest forms of love we have.

    I find myself caring deeply about preserving these stories, like somehow, not necessarily unwillingly, but without really noticing, I assumed the responsibility of sharing these pieces of family history. Even though I never got to meet or remember most of the characters. I recognise that they are part of me. They are where I came from. And if not me, then who?

  • My child finishes a task and stops. Not because he’s done, but because he’s waiting. And I clap. And I didn’t realise until recently that I might have trained that moment into existence.

    There’s a moment in my house that I didn’t notice becoming a moment until it had already become a system.

    It isn’t dramatic. There’s no big breakthrough music. No emotional montage. It’s just a pause.

    My child finishes something — a task, a step, a small sequence of actions that technically counts as success — and then he stops. Not because he’s done in the abstract sense, but because he’s waiting.

    Waiting for something to tell him it is done.

    And, almost without thinking, I supply it.

    I clap.

    Not a polite clap. Not an understated acknowledgement. A full, slightly over-committed performance of approval. The kind of clap that says: yes, that was correct, that was real, that counts, we are all witnessing it together.

    At the time, it never felt strange. It felt useful. It felt like communication. It felt like I was making the world clearer.

    Because clarity is a big part of parenting a child who experiences the world differently. You’re constantly trying to translate invisible processes into visible signals. You’re trying to make success legible.

    And applause is legible.

    It’s immediate. It’s unambiguous. It says “yes” in a language that doesn’t require interpretation.

    So we used it.

    A lot.

    But here’s the thing I only started to notice later, in the quieter gaps between moments.

    My child doesn’t just respond to the applause.

    He waits for it.

    Not in a performative way. Not in a seeking attention way. In a completion way.

    As if the act itself is not fully finished until the signal arrives.

    And that’s where something shifted for me — not suddenly, but slowly, like noticing a background noise you’ve lived with for years.

    Because I realised that what I had been calling encouragement might also be functioning as something else entirely.

    A kind of completion cue.

    A signal that doesn’t just celebrate success, but defines it.

    And once you see that, you can’t entirely unsee it.

    There’s a particular kind of pause now that I recognise in him. He finishes something and stops, just for a fraction of a second. Not uncertain, exactly. More like… waiting for confirmation that reality has acknowledged what just happened.

    And I find myself noticing my own response inside that pause.

    Do I clap immediately, as I always have?

    Do I wait?

    Do I let silence sit there and see what it does?

    And in that moment, I become aware of something slightly uncomfortable: I am now part of the system I am observing.

    This is the strange thing about parenting — especially parenting a child who relies on external cues to navigate understanding. You don’t just teach behaviours. You build languages. And then those languages start to exist independently of your intention.

    What began as encouragement can quietly become structure.

    What began as support can become rhythm.

    What began as helping can become choreography.

    I don’t think this is something I “did wrong.” That isn’t quite the feeling. It’s more subtle than that. More ambiguous.

    It’s the feeling of realising that something you thought was optional has become part of how the world is understood in your home.

    And once that realisation arrives, it brings a slightly uncomfortable question with it:

    If I stop clapping, does the moment still complete itself?

    Or have I become the punctuation mark at the end of every action?

    There are days when I experiment with that question in small ways.

    I pause a second longer than usual.

    I soften the response.

    Sometimes I don’t respond immediately at all, just to see what happens in the space that opens up.

    And what I notice isn’t confusion or distress in any dramatic sense.

    It’s more like a search. A brief scan for the missing signal. A checking of the air.

    And then, often, I still clap.

    Because I understand what the clap is doing. It isn’t just praise. It’s orientation. It’s confirmation. It’s a way of saying: you did it, and I see it, and it is complete.

    But now I also see the cost of that clarity, which is that clarity can become dependency if you’re not careful about how it’s learned.

    And that’s where I get stuck. Not in guilt, but in awareness. In the strange position of being both the person who helped build a system and the person who is now noticing it operating.

    While writing this, I realised something about our home that I hadn’t fully named before.

    What I thought of as encouragement has, in practice, become part of how my child understands completion — a signal in the loop between us. Not because that was the intention, but because repetition turns communication into structure.

    And that realisation didn’t feel like a judgement. It felt like a shift in visibility.

    Like suddenly seeing the outline of something you’ve been walking through every day.

    It made me pause and wonder not just about my own experience, but about how often this happens quietly in other homes too. Not in the dramatic sense. Not in the “we created a dependency” sense. But in the small, repeated ways we teach each other how to recognise completion.

    How we learn what counts.

    How we know when to stop.

    How we understand that something is finished.

    Because sometimes we think we are just encouraging. And sometimes, without meaning to, we become the signal that tells someone the moment is complete.

     

  • So… apparently I’m not coping correctly.

    Which is interesting, because I thought I was just… living my life.

    But no.

    There seems to be a right way to react to certain situations, and if you don’t follow the emotional script properly, people get… unsettled.

    And in my case, I have a disabled child—which, as it turns out, comes with a very specific storyline that I was apparently supposed to stick to. When I applied for the job as special needs parent, my agent failed to provide me with the screenplay.

    There’s an expectation. There’s a tone. There’s… a vibe. And I seem to have missed it completely.

    Because from what I can gather, the expected reaction is something along the lines of: struggle, grief, quiet overwhelm, maybe a soft-focus montage of me staring out a window while processing everything.

    And listen—fair enough. That is a reality for a lot of people.

    But the confusion seems to come from the fact that… I’m okay. Like, genuinely. Not in a “she’s clearly suppressing something” way. Not in a “this will all come crashing down in six months” way. Just… okay. And that seems to make people deeply uncomfortable. Because when you don’t match the expected emotional tone, people start trying to… correct it. Gently. Politely. Slightly concerned. You’ll get things like: “Are you sure you’re dealing with everything?”

    …yes.

    “Have you thought about talking to someone?” I mean, I’ve talked to a lot of people. None of them seem qualified, but we’ve covered ground. Or my personal favourite: “You’re very strong.” Which sounds like a compliment, but often feels like: “this doesn’t match what I would expect, so I’m going to label it strength instead of questioning it further.”

    And then there’s the subtle suggestion—sometimes not even that subtle—that maybe I’m… avoiding it. That I’m hiding behind the day-to-day. That I’m so busy managing everything that I haven’t actually processed it. Which is always fascinating to me, because… I didn’t realise processing something had to be a lifelong public performance.

    Like, at some point… I dealt with it. Not in a dramatic, cinematic, breakthrough moment. Just… over time. In real life. In between appointments and paperwork and trying to remember why I walked into a room. And I think this is the bit that gets lost. Because people are very comfortable with visible struggle. It makes sense. It fits the narrative. It’s recognisable. But quiet acceptance? Just getting on with it? That seems to throw people off completely.

    Personally, I enjoy seeing them unsettled… (cue nervous laughter) And I don’t actually think this is just about me.

    I think we do this all the time. We decide how someone should feel about something… and then when they don’t match that, we get a bit… suspicious. Like: “Are you sure you’re okay?” And you’re like: “…was I supposed to not be?” You see it everywhere. Someone handles something well, and instead of people being relieved, there’s this slight confusion. Like you’ve skipped a step. Like you’ve gone off-script. And I think when it comes to having a disabled child, the script is just… stronger. Heavier. There’s this unspoken belief that you should be carrying something visibly difficult at all times. And if you’re not… then maybe you’re not doing it properly.

    But here’s the thing. Functioning well doesn’t mean I don’t understand the reality. Being okay doesn’t mean I haven’t been through it. And just because I’m not performing it in a way that’s recognisable… doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.

    I’m not avoiding my life. I’m living it. Very efficiently, I might add. I’m not in denial… I’m scheduling things. And I think sometimes what makes people uncomfortable is not that you’re struggling… it’s that you’re not struggling in the way they expected you to.

    Because if they were in your position, they imagine they would feel a certain way. And when you don’t reflect that back to them… it unsettles the whole picture. So the easiest explanation becomes: “Maybe she just hasn’t dealt with it yet.” Which is a very neat way of restoring the storyline.

    But maybe… maybe the storyline is just wrong. Maybe some people do fall apart. Maybe some people take years to process. Maybe some people need therapy, support, space—all of it. And maybe some people… quietly, gradually, without announcing it… deal with something, accept it, and then carry on.

    And I think the problem isn’t that I’m not coping. I think the problem is… I’m not coping in a way that makes other people comfortable. Which, to be honest… sounds like a them issue.

    And I’m already fully booked.

  • Its not a lifestyle. It’s a mild narrative crisis in homeware form.

    I need to start by saying I don’t believe my salt lamp has powers. I’m not one of those people who thinks it’s secretly filtering the air or communicating with my ancestors or doing whatever the internet claims it does when you Google it at 1am. I’m rational enough to know it’s a glowing rock. A warm, slightly damp glowing rock.

    And yet.

    And yet it is, in a deeply unofficial capacity, holding me together.

    Not emotionally curing me. Not fixing my life. Just… quietly existing in a corner of my house like a very low-stakes lighthouse saying, “We are still here. No one has been fully consumed by chaos yet.” Which, honestly, feels like a win most days.

    Because the thing is, I think we’ve all started building lives out of objects that don’t actually do anything, but feel like they mean something. Not in a grand spiritual way. In a “if this lamp is on, I am technically a person who has their life in order” kind of way.

    I have a salt lamp. I also have a kettle that I put on the stove. Yes. I know. It takes about seven minutes longer than an electric kettle. Seven minutes in modern life is practically a Victorian hardship. I could boil water faster with friction and regret. And yet I use it anyway.

    Because when it whistles, something happens in my brain. It’s not hydration. It’s not efficiency. It’s narrative. It’s sound. It’s drama. It says: something is happening now that requires attention, but not urgency.

    Have I overcomplicated my life for a kettle? Yes. Do I care? No.

    Because those seven minutes are not about boiling water. They are about becoming the kind of person who stands in a kitchen while something gently announces itself to the world.

    And that’s the theme I keep coming back to: we are all surrounding ourselves with unnecessarily complicated things that bring us a very specific, slightly irrational kind of joy.

    Not everything in life is optimised. Some things are just… felt.

    Like my salt lamp. Which I turn on at night like I’m initiating a very low-budget transformation sequence. The room goes orange. The chaos of the day gets slightly softer at the edges. Nothing has actually changed, but my nervous system gets the message: “we are transitioning now.”

    And I think that’s what a lot of this is really about. Not healing. Not fixing. Just signalling.

    Because life doesn’t naturally come with clean transitions anymore. Everything is just… ongoing. Work bleeds into home. Rest bleeds into scrolling. You don’t finish the day so much as you slowly lose momentum and end up staring at something glowing in your hand wondering what you were doing five minutes ago.

    So we create signals. We light the lamp. We put the kettle on. We sit in the same chair that apparently tells our brain it is safe to stop being a functional human for a while.

    And then there are the other objects. The ones that are not calming, but strangely persistent.

    Like the macramé table runner I’ve been halfway through for six months.

    Will I use it? No.

    Do I enjoy seeing it half finished? Also no.

    It just exists. Hanging there like a craft project that lost its sense of direction somewhere around week two and never quite recovered. It’s not décor. It’s not clutter. It’s emotional ambience. It’s the physical manifestation of “I started something with enthusiasm and then had to go lie down for several months.”

    And I think that’s important too. We don’t just live among intentional calming objects. We also live among unfinished things that quietly remind us we are human and therefore not particularly linear.

    So in my house right now, I have a salt lamp for calm, a kettle for ritual, and a half-finished macramé table runner that represents unresolved ambition.

    Am I a ‘closet witch’ – I think try to be… but much like my craft projects, the idea of it is much more enticing than actually committing to a life altering directional change before dinner. The intent is there, the stamina needs warming on the lamp first; or on the stove if I’m trying to be more efficient…

    What I’m saying is that this ‘stuff’ is not a lifestyle. It is a mild narrative crisis in homeware form.

    And maybe that’s the most honest version of adulthood I’ve come across so far. Not mastery. Not optimisation. Not everything in its place.

    Just a collection of objects that help us feel slightly more like ourselves in between everything else asking us to be something else.

    And if that means I need a glowing rock, a whistling kettle, and a string-based identity crisis hanging off a chair to get through the week… then honestly, that feels like a perfectly reasonable system. Not efficient. But understandable.

    And some days, that’s more than enough.

  • I think in the middle of emotional regulation, boundary setting, and fighting over screen time… we forget about the small, strange, slightly unhinged moments that somehow become your everyday life.

    “We don’t eat crayons.”

    When would a normal person ever say that? How did we wake up one day and that became a completely reasonable sentence?

    Along with:

    “Please stop putting that in your nose.”

    “No, the dog does not want to wear your shoes.”

    “Yes, we do have to wear pants.”

    And the worst part is… we don’t even question it anymore.

    Do you remember the type of parent you were when your children were still imaginary? Clean, organised, calm. Raising a small von Trapp Family… who said “yes ma’am and never once had a visible booger. Those were simpler times.

    I have two children, 11 and 10, and I regularly find myself shouting at them… at the house… at myself… I’m not entirely sure

    But it’s usually something like: “I can only deal with one ridiculous person at a time, please.”

    There’s a level of chaos in parenting that no one fully explains to you. You think its going to be busy, but, you don’t realise its going to be confusing.

    You walk into a room and immediately forget why you are there. Not in a normal way, In a…something has happened here…. And I don’t have the full story kind of way.

    And the objects? Why are there so many objects. None of them belong to you anymore, your house slowly fills up with things you don’t remember buying. Your amazon basket used to be copper pots and silk bedsheets, now is slime and magic erasers…. And somehow you are just expected to know where everything is . At all times.

    And then are public moments where everything unravels… in front of other adults. And you are trying to remain calm… while internally, absolutely nothing is calm. You’re sweating, you’re negotiating, you’re making deals that you have no intention of keeping. Yeah, we’ll absolutely do that later… there is no later.

    Sometimes all the ridiculousness can sting a bit… and it’s never just one person feeling it.

    When you use the wrong plate. Or you cut the cheese. Or you didn’t cut the cheese. Or there was no cheese.

    Who knew cheese could cause carry that level of emotional weight? I’m fairly sure there are relationships out there that didn’t survive cheese.

    And then somehow, in the middle of all of that chaos, they hug you like you’re the best thing that’s ever happened to them. And you just stand there thinking… I don’t really know what just happened… but I’m going to take the hug.

    We find ourselves saying things like: “Why are you naked?” “That is not a snack.” “We cannot bring the rock to bed.” And we say it so calmly… like this is just a completely normal way to spend your day.  Unreasonable things become normal. Eating cold food. Going to the bathroom with an audience. Celebrating silence like it’s a luxury item. and hot coffee…. What happened to hot coffee? And at some point, this just becomes your baseline.

    And maybe that’s the most ridiculous part of all. Not the milestones. Not the big emotional moments. But the in-between. The slightly chaotic, slightly absurd, completely ordinary days. … that’s where most of life is actually happening.

    Because one day, this won’t be your normal anymore. You won’t be asked to look at something every 30 seconds. Or explain why we don’t eat toothpaste. And I don’t think we’ll miss the chaos… But we might miss the version of life where everything felt this alive.

    My 11 year old has stated moving into that space, she doesn’t need me the same way, she doesn’t want the cuddles or the hair strokes. Now she wants privacy, a closed bathroom door, a salmon bagel instead of heart shaped sandwiches. Her friends are her audience now and I’ve been gently reassigned… to something closer to a bank manager

    Its easy to take these unhinged moments for granted because we’re focus on the ‘big’ things. We get so busy raising our children and forget to ‘be’ with them. We move through the chaos sometimes without really noticing it.

    And every now and then you catch a glimpse of yourself in a mirror, or a window. Holding something random, covered in something questionable… and you just think: how did I get here.

    So if today felt a bit ridiculous… you’re probably right where you’re supposed to be.

Domestic Anthropology

  • There is a point in parenting where you realise you are no longer raising a child. You are now the unpaid HR department for a tiny online corporation run entirely through Roblox.

    Now, for context, when I was growing up, if your friend annoyed you, you simply stopped cycling to their house. That was it. The friendship dissolved naturally like yoghurt left in the sun.

    Modern children, however, do not merely “have friends.” They operate digital empires.

    My daughter currently runs some kind of Roblox lion organisation called The Lion Pride, which sounds innocent until you realise it functions with the emotional intensity of a small medieval kingdom.

    At one point I made the mistake of asking:

    “What exactly do you do in Lion Pride?”

    And she looked at me — genuinely offended by my ignorance — and explained:

    “We roleplay as lions.”

    Now. In my mind, I assumed this meant adventure. Running through forests. Hunting antelope. Maybe the occasional dramatic cliff scene.

    No.

    Apparently the lions mostly:

    sit around,

    lick themselves,

    discuss rank,

    throw themselves off cliffs for emotional effect,

    and spend real money on decorative accessories.

    Which, honestly, is beginning to sound less like wildlife simulation and more like an anthropology documentary about humanity itself.

    The sombreros were where I finally emotionally detached from reality.

    One evening my daughter approached me with the seriousness of someone requesting a mortgage approval and explained that she urgently required Robux because a lion in the group needed a Mexican-style hat.

    Now. I want you to understand the absurdity of this moment.

    I am a 39-year-old woman. I pay taxes. I monitor glucose spikes. I organise medications. I navigate disability services. And yet somehow I found myself standing in my kitchen evaluating whether or not a virtual lion required a ceremonial sombrero to maintain social standing within an online pride hierarchy.

    And the worst part? She explained it with such confidence that for a brief moment I genuinely considered it.

    Because Roblox creates a psychological environment where nothing sounds fully impossible anymore.

    After enough exposure, your brain stops resisting.

    “Oh yes, of course. The lions need hats. Naturally.”

    The frightening thing is how quickly these games develop entire economic systems.

    Within weeks there are:

    ranks,

    territories,

    ceremonies,

    social politics,

    uniforms,

    and somebody crying because another lion allegedly copied someone else’s tail aesthetic.

    It is essentially LinkedIn for children, except everyone is a feline.

    And meanwhile the parents are all standing slightly outside the situation like exhausted diplomats trying to prevent international conflict.

    You’ll see messages from other parents saying things like:

    “Hi, just wondering if your child is still co-leading the mountain clan?”

    Mountain clan?! WHAT MOUNTAIN CLAN?

    I thought we were buying educational apps. Nobody explained there would eventually be lion governance.

    And the emotional investment is extraordinary.

    My daughter will emerge from Roblox absolutely devastated because:

    “The pride exiled me.”

    I’m sorry? EXILED?

    You’re eleven. You still leave wet towels on the floor. You cannot be exiled from an imaginary lion monarchy.

    But they can. And they are. Daily.

    Honestly, though, watching it unfold is weirdly fascinating.

    Because beneath all the chaos, Roblox is basically children practising humanity.

    Leadership. Belonging. Status. Identity. Friendship. Conflict. Fashion. Power. Symbolism.

    Just with significantly more sombreros.

    And somewhere in Ireland, I sit on my couch staring into the middle distance thinking:

    “I was not prepared for this level of anthropological responsibility.”

  • I have just spent four and a half hours trying to buy concert tickets for my eleven-year-old daughter.

    Now when I was younger, buying concert tickets involved maybe standing outside a shop for a little while, wearing a denim jacket, and then eventually somebody handed you paper. That was the system. You exchanged money for entry. Very straightforward. Very human.

    This… this was psychological warfare.

    Apparently this artist is called Katseye. K-A-T-S-E-Y-E. Which already feels aggressive somehow. Like if punctuation became a girl band.

    Now, I would like to point out that this concert is not even happening in the country where we live. No. My daughter has a pen pal in another country who she has never met, and somehow the adults in this situation collectively decided that international concert attendance was now a realistic life objective.

    So this morning began with me opening my laptop thinking: “Oh, I’ll just quickly get tickets.”

    Four and a half hours later I looked like I had been coordinating air traffic control during a national emergency.

    At one point I had:

    my phone,

    my laptop,

    my husband checking another browser,

    and in another country entirely, a man I have never met before — my daughter’s friend’s father — also sitting at TWO laptops sweating under pressure while his daughter hovered over him like a tiny emotionally unstable supervisor.

    There were at least four adults across two countries emotionally collapsing over a children’s concert.

    And the worst part is the queue system gives you hope.

    You watch the little progress bar moving slowly and suddenly your body starts producing adrenaline like you’re escaping a bear attack.

    Then finally — FINALLY — after ninety minutes you get access to the ticket page.

    And the website immediately accuses you of being a bot.

    A BOT.

    Sir, I am a forty-year-old mother stress-eating almonds and emotionally deteriorating in yoga pants while trying to secure joy for children. Does that sound like artificial intelligence to you?

    Four separate times I got through the queue. Four separate times I selected tickets. Four separate times the website essentially looked at me and said: “Absolutely not, criminal.”

    I have never felt more rejected by technology in my life.

    At one stage I became so enraged by my phone that I physically placed it face down on the table because I could feel myself entering the type of emotional state usually associated with hostage negotiations.

    And meanwhile my daughter is completely calm.

    Children have absolutely no appreciation for logistical suffering.

    She’s just standing there every now and then saying: “Did you get them?”

    NO, DARLING. The Internet believes your mother is running an illegal ticket syndicate from the kitchen.

    Also, why are modern concerts designed like the Hunger Games?

    Why do I need:

    queue strategy,

    device rotation,

    captcha verification,

    account authentication,

    emotional resilience,

    and apparently biometric proof that I am a real woman with a real child?

    At one point I genuinely considered giving up entirely and becoming one of those families who just enjoys nature walks.

    But no. Because somewhere along the line modern parenting became this bizarre performance where you’re expected to create magical core memories while simultaneously battling corporate software systems built by sadists.

    And somehow, internationally, all of us parents are now linked together in shared trauma.

    Some poor father in another country is also sitting there sweating over Ticketmaster while his child breathes directly onto his neck whispering: “Dad, the queue moved.”

    Honestly, by the end of today I didn’t even care about the concert anymore.

    I just wanted validation from the website.

    I wanted Ticketmaster to look me in the eyes and say: “You are human. And you have suffered enough.”

  • I realised something today about parenting.

    There are certain activities that are not actually for the children. They are endurance events designed specifically for parents. And sports day is one of them.

    Now, today my daughter had sports day. Which means my entire schedule immediately collapsed. Suddenly my whole day revolved around sitting outside in direct sunlight watching eleven-year-olds move at varying levels of distress across a field.

    And look, before anyone gets offended, I love my daughter deeply. I would willingly sit through four consecutive hours of her talking about Greek mythology. I would attend a twelve-part poetry recital. If she entered an academic competition, I’d be there emotionally prepared like a mother entering battle.

    Because that is her arena.

    My daughter is clever. She reads Percy Jackson books like she’s being personally trained by Zeus. She gets As and Bs. She treats school like an educational institution instead of a social networking event.

    Athletics, however…

    Athletics is not where her gifts live.

    When she runs, it looks like a badger is chasing her. And the badger is winning.

    There’s this expression on her face during races that suggests she did not consent to the experience and is now trying to exit it physically.

    And the strange thing is, all the parents know. Every single parent sitting there knows exactly what category their child falls into.

    You’ve got the sporty children who arrive at school essentially sponsored by isotonic drinks. Their parents are wearing sunglasses and confidence. They’ve brought fold-out chairs. Some of them probably stretch beforehand.

    Then there are the academic children. Our kids run like Victorian children escaping industrial hardship. Arms everywhere. Knees moving independently. Looking emotionally betrayed by the concept of sprinting.

    And yet somehow we all gather outside pretending the Olympics are unfolding before us.

    The schools always try to create this atmosphere of encouragement. “Come on everybody! Participation is what matters!”

    No it isn’t.

    If participation was what mattered, sports day would be held indoors with snacks and optional lying down areas.

    This is very clearly about speed.

    And honestly, I think what makes sports day psychologically exhausting is that it’s public struggling.

    If my daughter writes an incredible essay, that achievement happens quietly. Intellect is subtle. Academic talent happens privately. But sports day? Sports day is essentially a live outdoor performance review of your child’s relationship with coordination.

    In front of hundreds of people.

    In heat.

    With no shade.

    And because I’m her mother, I still cheer like she’s making history. Meanwhile internally I’m thinking, “Sweetheart, you are being overtaken by a child dressed as a carrot.”

    And the worst part is that my daughter doesn’t even particularly enjoy it either. We’re both trapped in the same social ritual together. I’m sitting there overheating while she’s somewhere on a field wondering why humans evolved to run recreationally.

    I think that’s the hidden reality of parenting actually.

    You spend years discovering who your child is, and then society keeps trying to temporarily force them into somebody else’s category.

    And sometimes the funniest part of parenting is sitting there fully aware of who your child really is while the world insists they should be winning sack races.

    Meanwhile your child is secretly destined to become a lawyer, author, historian, or criminal mastermind.

    Not an Olympian.

    And honestly?

    I still went. I still clapped. I still shouted encouragement while she panic-ran across a field like woodland prey. Because I know one day there’ll be another event — a poetry reading, an academic award, some deeply intellectual thing — and that’s when she’ll stand there completely in her element.

    And I’ll probably still have to sit in an uncomfortable chair for four hours.

 Folklore and Fantasy

  • There is a very specific type of optimism that exists inside people who buy money trees.

    Because logically, as a 39-year-old adult woman with online banking, direct debits and a mild understanding of economics, I am fully aware that a small tropical plant from a garden centre cannot physically generate financial income.

    And yet.

    The second I saw it, some deeply ancient part of my nervous system whispered:

    “Well… it certainly can’t hurt.”

    That is how vulnerable the modern adult becomes under financial pressure. You start accidentally drifting into botanical superstition.

    Now, in fairness, the money tree looked incredibly convincing in the shop. Strong trunk. Glossy leaves. Standing there radiating confidence like it had a pension plan and two rental properties.

    And the label — “Money Tree.”

    Very direct branding.

    Not “Decorative Indoor Plant.”

    Not “Tropical Leaf Arrangement.”

    No.

    Money. Tree.

    You cannot call something a money tree and then expect financially unstable women not to project wildly onto it.

    So I brought it home with genuine enthusiasm. Positioned it carefully in the kitchen where it could absorb natural light and, ideally, passive income. I watered it. I admired it. I looked at it several times a day like:

    “Well? Any developments?”

    Nothing.

    In fact, the more my bank account deteriorated, the more the plant itself appeared emotionally affected by the situation.

    The leaves started drooping slightly.

    Not dramatically.

    Just enough to communicate:

    “I, too, have seen the electricity bill.”

    And now we exist together in quiet economic despair.

    The money tree on the counter.

    Me beside it eating discount yoghurt while googling “how long can you survive on leftover fajita mix.”

    What’s interesting though is how quickly humans create symbolic meaning around objects when life feels uncertain.

    Because the truth is, I didn’t really buy a plant.

    I bought optimism.

    A tiny domestic symbol that maybe things could improve.

    That maybe abundance could enter the house.

    That maybe life wouldn’t always feel like calculating whether you can justify branded cheese this week.

    And honestly? I think loads of us do this in different ways.

    Some people buy crystals.

    Some people journal manifestations.

    Some people sage the house.

    And some of us stand in IKEA holding a braided tree thinking:

    “This feels financially responsible somehow.”

    Meanwhile the actual reality is that my money tree is currently sitting beside:

    unopened post,

    reusable shopping bags,

    a disabled buggy charger,

    and a child requesting Robux with the persistence of a telecommunications scammer.

    The environment is not exactly Wall Street.

    But weirdly… I still love the stupid little tree.

    Because despite everything, it represents hope.

    And lately I’ve realised hope itself is actually a form of survival.

    Not delusional hope.

    Not “I’m going to become a millionaire through photosynthesis” hope.

    Just:

    “Maybe things are moving in the right direction.”

    Which is ironic timing really, because this same week:

    my writing got accepted by a national publication,

    my website suddenly matters,

    and my career path appears to be transforming entirely through a sequence of giraffes, podcasts and emotional collapse.

    So perhaps the money tree is working.

    Just very slowly.

    Like the Irish public sector.

  • Ramses is not technically a dangerous dog.

    I want to clarify that immediately for legal reasons and also because he looks like a Victorian orphan who reads poetry beside a lighthouse.

    But emotionally?

    Ramses operates at a level of psychological intensity that should not be available to domestic animals.

    Now when we first got him, the understanding was that he would become:

    emotionally supportive,

    family friendly,

    and perhaps a calming presence within the household.

    Which in hindsight was a wildly optimistic interpretation of the situation.

    Because unfortunately, Ramses turned out to be what I now refer to as:

    The Onion of Deceit.

    Everything about him LOOKS trustworthy.

    The floppy ears. The sorrowful eyes. The gentle face.

    And then somebody enters the apartment and suddenly he transforms into a tiny trench soldier defending Western Europe from invasion.

    Honestly, he would have done incredibly well in the trenches.

    Hypervigilant. Emotionally committed to the unit. Prepared to launch himself into conflict with absolutely no regard for his own wellbeing.

    The Amazon driver never stood a chance.

    Now to be fair to Ramses, I do think life feels genuinely overwhelming for him.

    This dog experiences existence at maximum emotional volume.

    A leaf moves outside? National emergency.

    Someone closes a door? Emotional betrayal.

    The co-custodian leaves the apartment? Complete psychological collapse.

    Which is probably why, for a dog that is supposedly emotionally supportive, Ramses is currently on a surprising amount of anxiety medication.

    And honestly? Fair enough.

    Because at one point the situation escalated so dramatically that we actually sent him to an eight-week residential dog psychology board and train programme.

    At a cost of nearly four thousand euros.

    Four thousand.

    I don’t even know why I’m laughing because objectively that is not funny.

    That is the cost of an international holiday.

    But instead of travelling abroad, we sent our spaniel to what was essentially a very expensive emotional rehabilitation retreat.

    Some people send their children to summer camp.

    We sent Ramses for psychological intervention.

    Now somewhere during this process I vaguely remember the trainer mentioning possible neurological cognition difficulties, at which point I mentally exited the conversation immediately because I simply did not have the emotional capacity for another neurological profile in this household.

    There are already enough neurodivergent people in this apartment.

    I cannot begin emotionally accommodating a spaniel with complex processing needs as well.

    So for psychological survival reasons, I chose denial.

    And honestly? We’re all happier there.

    The truly confusing part is that despite all of this… I love him deeply.

    Unfortunately.

    Because underneath the trench warfare instincts and behavioural instability, Ramses is also:

    loyal,

    affectionate,

    emotionally devoted,

    and weirdly sensitive.

    Sometimes he’ll quietly place his paw on Oliver’s leg and look at him with this enormous emotional sincerity like he personally understands suffering.

    And suddenly you remember: oh no…

    This isn’t an evil creature.

    It’s just a psychologically overwhelmed spaniel trying his absolute best not to fight the postman.

  • Phyllis is currently my best performing child.

    And before anyone judges me psychologically for saying that, I would like to point out that Phyllis has shown consistent growth, 

    emotional stability, 

    and a genuine enthusiasm to live under my care.

    The other children… less measurable results.

    Now, technically, Phyllis is a monstera plant.

    But emotionally, within the ecosystem of the apartment, she occupies the position of:

    respected matriarch,

    botanical dependent,

    and occasionally, therapeutic role model.

    Because unlike the rest of the household, Phyllis responds extremely positively to intervention.

    I move her toward indirect sunlight? Immediate growth.

    I water her correctly? Thriving.

    I rotate her strategically? New leaf.

    Meanwhile, I spend twelve consecutive years emotionally and financially supporting human children only to discover one of them has built a lion cult on Roblox where apparently eighteen lions sit around on a rock licking themselves while purchasing symbolic sombreros using real money.

    So naturally, comparisons begin occurring.

    Now unfortunately, there was a brief period where Phyllis lived in my bedroom. 

    This arrangement ended after my eleven-year-old developed a genuine psychological concern regarding what she referred to as: “the tentacle roots.”

    Which, to be fair, 

    looking back, 

    was not entirely unreasonable because monsteras do produce aerial roots that emerge from the plant like they are actively searching for human infrastructure.

    And when you wake up at 2am and see one stretching slowly toward your bed through low lighting… the atmosphere does become slightly Victorian orphanage.

    INSERT PICTURE

    So for psychological reasons, Phyllis was relocated into the main apartment where she now oversees the ecosystem from her ceramic throne beside two decorative birds that honestly look like they have witnessed maritime disasters.

    The co-custodian accepted this transition with the exhausted silence of a man who understands resistance is no longer strategically useful.

    Because this is the important thing people misunderstand about me psychologically: 

    I do not decorate.

    I construct emotional ecosystems.

    Most people look at a plant and think: “That’s nice.”

    I look at a plant and think: “What role does this organism play within the emotional architecture of the room?”

    And apparently the answer is: “stable daughter energy.”

    Now, I have occasionally used Phyllis as a motivational example for the actual children.

    Not aggressively. 

    Just observationally.

    For example: “Look at Phyllis. Notice her willingness to grow.”

    Which is difficult for the children because unfortunately… Phyllis is winning.

    She’s emotionally regulated. 

    She appreciates hydration. 

    And she has never once asked me for Robux.

    Honestly at this stage, she may be the only member of the household fully cooperating with the vision.

    The truly concerning part is that I don’t think the apartment belongs to us anymore.

    I think Phyllis now governs the space quietly through atmosphere.

    And frankly?

    I respect her authority.

  • I think it’s time to introduce arguably the most important character of this story… the reluctant co-custodian.

    Now, technically speaking, this man is my husband.

    But emotionally, over the last ten years, he has slowly evolved into the unwilling administrative supervisor of what can only be described as my expanding anthropological empire.

    Ten years ago, I married an accountant.

    The accountant married a quirky 25-year-old fresh back from her gap year. Now we sit together in the evenings drinking tea from extremely fragile English china while discussing whether peptide preservation is appropriate for a giraffe we do not own.

    People often focus on the giraffe, or the lamp, or Phyllis… very few people stop to consider the emotional resilience required to live alongside someone who genuinely believes a taxidermied giraffe would “improve the atmosphere.”

    Now in fairness to him, the co-custodian did not enter this marriage under false pretences. I have always been slightly psychologically active.

    But...

    “There is a significant difference between: ‘Oh she’s quirky.’ And: ‘She wants to spend £9000 on a single impractical decorative item.’”

    I'm not oblivious to his plight...i fully recognise that I am relentless when I have an idea.... this man has learned to absorb my fantastical ideas with the exhausted neutrality of a man internally trying to decide how best to say ‘absolutely not'.

    Unfortunately for him, my brain does not experience ideas casually.

    Once I emotionally attach to something, the entire household slowly becomes involved in the process whether they consented or not.

    And over time, the reluctant co-custodian has developed the exhausted calm of a man who understands resistance is often futile.

    He recognises when the onion of deceit is dropping layers.

    This is a person who has received emergency international phone calls asking him to transfer money because: “It’s historically important.”

    No further information provided.

    At one stage he was working in Africa while I was in Ireland attempting to negotiate ownership of Marie Antoinette’s possible lamp inside a suspicious warehouse in Kildare.

    Most people would ask follow-up questions.

    The co-custodian simply transferred the money.

    Which honestly says more about the psychological condition of our marriage than anything else I could possibly explain.

    And yet despite all of this, he remains remarkably practical.

    While I am emotionally constructing Victorian safari mythology inside a two-bedroom apartment, he continues attempting to focus on things like:

    finances,

    available floor space,

    and “where will the children physically walk?”

    Which, in fairness, are valid concerns.

    I think that’s why the ecosystem works.

    Because every anthropological empire requires one emotionally exhausted realist standing quietly in the background saying: “Stephanie… no.”

    And despite all of this, he continues approaching every new escalation with the weary patience of a man who, against all practical instinct, still loves me deeply.

    Which honestly explains why he’s remained inside the ecosystem for this long.

    Of course, the problem is that sometimes even he accidentally becomes absorbed into the atmosphere.

    The other day I found myself discussing potential peptide treatment for the giraffe and instead of ending the conversation immediately… he paused briefly to consider the possible financial implications.

    Which means psychologically speaking, it may already be too late for both of us.

  • I seem to continue escalating my life in the most unconventional ways.

    Following on from my previous episode, immediately after failing to buy the 9 foot taxidermied giraffe, I instantly decided to go to the nearest antique warehouse, which was an hour and a half away, because there was very much a feeling of unfulfilled shopping. 

    This, suspicious looking warehouse owner, somehow convinced me that he had a lamp that once belonged to Marie Antoinette, or at least existed adjacent to Marie Antoinette. Now after the failed giraffe purchase...

    The lamp obviously caught my attention.

    During the negotiations, in my complete delusional state, I somehow managed to negotiate the price upwards from 75 euros to 80 euros.  

    Which by the way, is still a steal for French revolutionary memorabilia.

    Now, one of the issues that I was facing was that, this random antique warehouse on the outskirts of Kildare, run by a man who could barely speak English, did not have a contactless payment available.

    So I called the reluctant co-custodian of my anthropological empire... my husband, who was in Africa at the time

    He received what probably sounded like a panicked phone call asking him to transfer 80 euros from our bank account.

    At the time I was not concerned that our realities existed in different geographical time zones. 

    My husband didn’t even fully understand what I was purchasing.

    I think at one stage I just said: ‘It’s historically important.’

    Which in hindsight was an astonishingly vague explanation for an emergency international bank transfer.

    Eventually, I purchased the lamp. 

    Now realistically, I strongly suspect this lamp had never been anywhere near Marie Antoinette. But at the time, the atmosphere felt historically significant.

    Then I brought the lamp home. 

    INSERT PICTURE. 

    It's also worth bearing in mind that my mother, who was visiting from New Zealand at the time, was a witness to this purchase.

    She never once questioned it. To her, this seemed like completely normal behaviour for me. No red flags were raised...

    Looking back, the most concerning part is probably that my mother behaved as though this was a perfectly reasonable afternoon activity.

    At no stage did she say: ‘Stephanie, perhaps we should go home.’

    She simply observed the situation unfolding naturally.”

    Now you need to understand that I live in suburban Dublin, in a two bedroom apartment with a disabled child, my apartment is completely full of medical equipment. 

    Every nook and cranny is already occupied.

    There is no sensible place for this lamp to live. It became a complete onion of deceit.

    Luckily I am unphased by simple domestic complications so it's placement varies from time to time dependant on what catastrophe I'm dealing with that day.

    Sometimes it's hidden away in a kitchen cupboard, other times it's on the coffee table.

    It's always carefully watched over and everyone who lives here knows that they are not permitted to touch it. 

    The entire essence of this lamp felt deeply deceptive.

    Because suddenly this random object had become the most emotionally protected item in the apartment.

    Mobility equipment? Fine.

    Children launching themselves across furniture? Fine.

    But everyone understood: do not touch Marie Antoinette’s possible lamp.”

    Which leads me to Phyllis... my emotionally weary delicious monster who was once a witness to the colonisation of the new world - she has a slightly longer story which also is adjacent to the giraffe, but we'll leave her for next time.

  • I need to explain the proverbial giraffe in the room.

    And unfortunately, in this particular situation, the giraffe is not metaphorical.

    A few months ago, I came across a taxidermied giraffe online, it's probably useful to know that I've never actually seen the giraffe in real life.And when I say “taxidermied giraffe,” I don’t mean a tasteful little decorative object.

    I mean… a full neck and head situation.

    Nine feet tall.

    Like an actual architectural feature.

    And unfortunately, the moment I saw it, emotionally… I was in. This was no longer an internal discussion, I was fully committed to owning THAT giraffe. Now, logically, this made absolutely no sense. We live in a two-bedroom apartment. My son is disabled, so there is equipment everywhere. Guests don’t even fit here. At no point in the last five years has someone casually “popped over.”

    There is no available giraffe zone. And yet my brain immediately skipped all practical reality and went straight to: “But imagine how cool this would be when people came over.”

    Again. No people come over.

    That was not relevant to my thought process. Emotionally, I had already become the kind of mysterious woman who owned a giraffe. And honestly, I do think that would elevate the atmosphere. Who doesn't want to live in slight psychological discomfort?

    So for about three weeks, my husband lived in what I can only describe as the unfortunately zone. Because every single day, I was presenting new giraffe-related arguments. Not sensible arguments. Just observations. Like:

    “I do think it would create a talking point.”
    Or:
    “You don’t really see enough giraffes in modern interiors.”

    And my husband kept saying: “Why?” Which, to be fair, was a reasonable question considering this giraffe cost nine thousand pounds. For an enormous dead neck. And if I’m being completely honest, my answer every single time was simply: “Because that would be really cool.”

    And I meant that with my entire chest. Now, in hindsight, there are some practical flaws in the giraffe plan. For example: where would it go? Because once you actually look at the size of this thing, you realise you don’t “own” the giraffe. The giraffe becomes a household authority. You reorganise your life around it. Mobility equipment? Fine. Children? Fine.

    But now everyone also has to emotionally coexist with a looming Victorian safari ghost standing beside the television.

    That is not décor. That is a decision. And somehow I genuinely believed we could integrate this into our lives through the power of atmosphere alone. Which honestly explains a lot about how my brain works.

    At one stage I did briefly investigate the licensing requirements associated with owning a taxidermied giraffe, which in hindsight suggests the situation had progressed beyond ordinary curiosity, because, of course, in situations like this, compliance is important... I think this is why my husband no longer reacts with surprise to anything I say. Because after ten years together, he understands that once my brain emotionally adopts an idea, unfortunately… we are all going on the journey. Now, I'm not fully prepared to let the Giraffe go, there is still a very real possibility that a lottery win may make the Giraffe a resident of Block G